Tag Archives: brain

The Consciousness Prosthetics: The Multi-Billion Year Evolved Brain and how it Lies to You.

I attended the Quantified Self conference at Stanford University on Saturday and I wanted to digest and present some of my notes and observations, notes first.

THE MOST AMAZING THING I SAW

The number one amazing person I saw was Nancy Dougherty, Senior Electrical Engineer at Proteus Digital Health. I embed her previous year’s talk below about MINDFULNESS PILLS

These pills talk to her cell phone when she swallows them, this is proteus digital health technology. She labeled these pills as antidotes for her negative emotions, as a way to graph those emotions. In addition, she wanted to measure the placebo effect, which research shows works even when the taker KNOWS they are taking a placebo.

Calming Technology

I was surprised by the number of meditators at the conference. In fact, Sunday opened with a group meditation led by The Calming Technology Lab.

Your brain’s multi billion year advantage

What struck me at the conference was how there was simultaneously

  • a deep reverence for and
  • a deep suspicion of

the brain and sensory system to explain reality. I believe this stems from thousands of hours logged on self quantification experiments that truly uncover how the apparently seamless image of reality produced by the brain and sensory apparatus is really fragmented, discontinuous and untrustworthy, and how flashes of insight can be created by use of what I’ve decided to call consciousness prosthetics.

The first premise of this is simple that the brain itself is just an evolved information engine, and that this engine is primarily designed to process threat, nourishment and reproductive opportunities, probably in that order. It’s been evolving for several billion years at a minimum, and these main processing engines are extremely powerful… powerful enough to override conscious thought patterns.

I use the term “prosthetic” instead of “cybernetic” because it plays with the fusion of human and machine. A Prosthesis essentially replaces a missing part of a person, and I am here making the argument that conscious awareness is frequently a missing part of every person thanks to the limitations of the evolved mind.

In any event, the properties of Consciousness prosthesis as a subcategory of Quantified Self is characterized by the following:

  • Automated or near automated recording
  • Raises awareness of unconscious behaviors or mental states
  • Wearable or ingestable or highly body integrated technologies

What makes 2012 an interesting year from this perspective is the explosion of “smart mobile devices” including smartphones. With the ubiquity of powerful computing devices everywhere, we gain the ability (as do the projects above, both the Mindfulness pills and Breathware work hook up to smartphones) to ubiquitize this kind of equipment at a very low cost to just about everyone.

Posted in Mobile, Nerds, Neuroscience | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Consciousness Prosthetics: The Multi-Billion Year Evolved Brain and how it Lies to You.

The Neuroscience of Mobile App Engagement

My old pal Dylan Tweney @Dylan20 at VentureBeat wrote this fun article about Why Instagram is Worth 1 Billion and Your Startup Isnt.


The crux of the article is that Instagram fits my neuroscience model for user engagement. This is based on the observation that the Limbic System is primarily focused on three “threads” that run continuously in the background:

  • 1) Can I Eat This?
  • 2) Will this Eat Me? and
  • 3) Can I reproduce with this?

These threads come on line at different stages of human development.

Can I eat this comes first… a newborn baby doesnt even have much of this, except for maybe the ability to nurse. But soon this thread kicks into gear and babies crawl around like mad stuffing things into their mouths.

Will it eat me (The threat processing thread) comes online next, but it’s highly dependent on a maternal threat coprocessor and the user interface is the mom’s face. If mom looks scared, watch out, otherwise everything is ok. Babies dont have enough hardware to recognize and process threats. If you watch TV this is recapitulated in the “reaction shot” where a car blows up and the camera does a close shot of Farrah Fawcett’s face looking all shocked. (1970s Charlie’s Angels reference)

The reproductive thread doesnt spin up until puberty.

It turns out that there’s also a subthread in high-investment mammals which is the “it’s cute so I should protect it” thread, which is primarily about defending the young. This thread seems to show up weirdly early, which perhaps is related to siblings protecting each other.

Social impulses are built on top of this limbic system “platform”, in the sense that the “village” of your social network (in the Robin Dunbar sense) is what provides you with nutrition, protection and even a supply of reproductive partners.

How does this relate to the world of Mobile Apps? Exactly as Dylan perceives in this article… the highest engagement apps appeal to the lizard brain. The limbic system sits very close to the hindbrain and spine and is the big driver of action.

The other day someone tweeted “Why does California spend N Billion dollars on prisons and so much less on Schools?” What they might not realize is that the neocortex (responsible for things like thinking) is about the thickness of six playing cards stacked on top of each other, and that the word cortex means “bark” which kind of shows you how thin it is.

This kind of deep engagement shows up in applications like Pinterest. For example my Pinterest board is filled with good things to eat. I independently discovered the “cuteness” thread because I was searching for a broccoli recipe and a bunny rabbit named “broccoli” showed up. Since then pictures of cute animals have been replicating on my pinboard like umm… rabbits I guess.

In any event, this is my neuroscientific analysis of user engagement in mobile applications. Thanks for reading.

If you like it, please bonk the TWEET button below and retweet it!

Posted in Mobile, Nerds, Neuroscience | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Neuroscience of Mobile App Engagement

Unboxing and new laptop batteries

Hi folks,

A bit off topic, but there seems to be a bit of debate out there about what to do with a new laptop or netbook. For techies, the impulse is to unbox and get hands-on as quickly as possible. This impulse comes from deep within what Sigmund Freud identified as the Id, anatomically associated with the brain stem and the thalamus, the brain’s primitive center of sex and aggression.

Here is an example of the appropriate emotions that technology nerds experience when they hear the word “unboxing”.

But of course running counter to this is the impulse that flows from the SuperEgo–of course we all know that using a new laptop before the battery is fully charged will result in the battery exploding and your life span being shortened. Well, no actually the *battery’s* life span is supposedly shortened by using it this way and therefore many people advise an overnight charge for a new battery. Technical people naturally tend to believe somewhat superstitiously in “optimal” ways of doing things, and if optimal means waiting to use your shiny new laptop, then by all means lets wait.

So to rationalize these two very conflicting feelings I propose a best practice for unboxing laptops and netbooks. the best thing to do is to run the laptop on power as soon as you unbox it but to pull the battery out.

That way you get instant gratification and you can immediately start removing all of the crapware that the vendor put on it, but not ruin your battery and your future chances for reproductive success. Ok, maybe just the battery.

Later on, say at night, you can pop the battery in and give it that full nights charge that it so richly deserves.

Posted in Nerds | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Unboxing and new laptop batteries